Difference between revisions of "Beer color, alkalinity and mash pH"
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)  
Line 2:  Line 2:  
    
−  
+  Mash pH is the result of the balance between grist grist acidity and water alkalinity. The acidity of the grist is determined by the malts used and darker malts are generally more acidic than lighter colored ones. The color of the malts used in the grist also determine the beer color to a large extend. On the other hand water alkalinity, to be correct its residual alkalinity, is determined by its mineral composition. It therefore stands to reason that beer color and water composition, necessary for a proper mash pH, are related.  
−  +  This article uses results from [http://braukaiser.com/documents/effect_of_water_and_grist_on_mash_pH.pdf mash pH experiments] to shed light on the relationship between beer color, mash pH and water composition. It develops a formula that can be used to make a crude prediction of the mash pH, or the alkalinity necessary for a given mash pH, based on the color and mash thickness of the beer. This formula has been implemented in the water calculator ([http://braukaiser.com/documents/Kaiser_water_calculator.xls Kaiser_water_calculator.xls]) to predict mash pH from beer color, mash thickness and water composition.  
−  +  
−  This article uses results from [http://braukaiser.com/documents/effect_of_water_and_grist_on_mash_pH.pdf mash pH experiments] to shed light on the relationship between beer color, mash pH and water composition. It  +  
=Malt color, type and acidity=  =Malt color, type and acidity=  
+  
+    
+    
Brewers know that darker malts are more acidic. But what does it mean for a malt to be more acidic? They for sure don't taste sour.  Brewers know that darker malts are more acidic. But what does it mean for a malt to be more acidic? They for sure don't taste sour.  
−  Malt acidity is the ability to lower  +  Malt acidity is the malt's ability to lower mash pH and it can be measured via 2 means. One is the pH of a distilled water mash. Because of the absence of pH affecting water ions the pH of that mash is determined only by malt acidity and mash thickness. Another approach is to take a sample from such a mash and add a strong base (e.g sodium hydroxide) to it until a predetermined pH (e.g pH 5.7) is reached. This process is called titration. The amount of base added per unit of malt is a direct measure of that malt's acidity. Testing the distilled water mash pH works well for base malts. Specialty malts, however, are generally much more acidic than base malts and testing their acidity through titration works better. 
In aforementioned [http://braukaiser.com/documents/effect_of_water_and_grist_on_mash_pH.pdf mash pH experiments] the following formula was developed for calculating the distilled water pH of a given grist.  In aforementioned [http://braukaiser.com/documents/effect_of_water_and_grist_on_mash_pH.pdf mash pH experiments] the following formula was developed for calculating the distilled water pH of a given grist.  
+  
+   valign="top"  [[Image:Icon_science.giflink=alt={Geeky Stuff}]]  
+    
+    
[[Image:Formula_pH_distilled_water_mash.gif]]  [[Image:Formula_pH_distilled_water_mash.gif]]  
Line 21:  Line 26:  
Where:  Where:  
*'''pH<sub>DI water mash</sub>''': the mash pH of the grist in distilled water  *'''pH<sub>DI water mash</sub>''': the mash pH of the grist in distilled water  
−  *'''pH<sub>bi</sub>''': the distilled water mash pH  +  *'''pH<sub>bi</sub>''': the distilled water mash pH of the particular base malt i 
*'''g<sub>bi</sub>''': the contribution of base malt i to the weight of the grist (between 0 and 1)  *'''g<sub>bi</sub>''': the contribution of base malt i to the weight of the grist (between 0 and 1)  
*'''g<sub>sj</sub>''': the contribution of the specialty malt j to the weight of the grist (between 0 and 1)  *'''g<sub>sj</sub>''': the contribution of the specialty malt j to the weight of the grist (between 0 and 1)  
Line 27:  Line 32:  
*'''R<sub>mash</sub>''': the mash thickness in l/kg  *'''R<sub>mash</sub>''': the mash thickness in l/kg  
−  In English the weighted  +  In English: the weighted average of the distilled water mash pH for all the base malts and the titration point for specialty malts (5.7) is determined. This pH is then lowered by the acidity of the specialty malts. The more acidic they are, the higher their grist percentage and the thicker the mash is the lower the mash pH of the grist will be. 
= Random recipe creation and pH and color calculations =  = Random recipe creation and pH and color calculations =  
−  +  Using the the measured values for the distilled water pH of selected base malts and acidity of selected specialty malts 210 recipes were simulated. The recipes were thrown together randomly with the following constraints:  
* 15 recipes mixed only base malts  * 15 recipes mixed only base malts  
* 45 recipes mixed base malts with up to 15% crystal malts. 50 of these recipes used only 2row as base malt. The other 15 used a random mix of different base malts. The percentage of crystal malts in these grists was randomly chosen between 1 and 15%. In addition to that the types and and percentages of different crystal malts were also chosen randomly  * 45 recipes mixed base malts with up to 15% crystal malts. 50 of these recipes used only 2row as base malt. The other 15 used a random mix of different base malts. The percentage of crystal malts in these grists was randomly chosen between 1 and 15%. In addition to that the types and and percentages of different crystal malts were also chosen randomly  
* 45 recipes mixed base malts with up to 8% crystal malts and up to 8% roasted malts. 50 of these recipes used only 2 row as base malt while the other 15 used a mix of base malts. Similar to the recipes that used only crystal malts as specialty malts these recipes here had their actual crystal and roasted malt percentages determined randomly. The same applied to the types of malts that were chosen  * 45 recipes mixed base malts with up to 8% crystal malts and up to 8% roasted malts. 50 of these recipes used only 2 row as base malt while the other 15 used a mix of base malts. Similar to the recipes that used only crystal malts as specialty malts these recipes here had their actual crystal and roasted malt percentages determined randomly. The same applied to the types of malts that were chosen  
−  * 45 recipes used only roasted malts.  +  * 45 recipes used only roasted malts. These recipes were created similar to the crystal only recipes mentioned earlier except that they only used roasted malts as base malts. 
−  Crystal and roasted malts were treated as distinct groups since they  +  Crystal and roasted malts were treated as distinct groups since they formed distinct clusters when their acidity was plotted over their color. 
For all these random recipes the distilled water mash pH of the grist and the color of the beer was calculated. The DI water mash pH was determined for 4 different mash thicknesses 2, 3, 4, and 5 l/kg. For the color calculation it was assumed that the total grist weighed 10 pound and the cast out volume was 5 gallon.  For all these random recipes the distilled water mash pH of the grist and the color of the beer was calculated. The DI water mash pH was determined for 4 different mash thicknesses 2, 3, 4, and 5 l/kg. For the color calculation it was assumed that the total grist weighed 10 pound and the cast out volume was 5 gallon.  
Line 44:  Line 49:  
[[Image:Beer_color_formulae.gif]]  [[Image:Beer_color_formulae.gif]]  
−  The result were 4 sets of 210 data points that represent realistic combinations of beer color (SRM) and the distilled water mash pH of their grists. One set for every evaluated  +  The result were 4 sets of 210 data points that represent fairly realistic combinations of beer color (SRM) and the distilled water mash pH of their grists. One set for every evaluated mash thickness (2, 3, 4 and 5 l/kg). The data for 3 l/kg is shown in Figure 1. 
−  [[Image:Beer_color_to_DI_pH.gifframecenterFigure 1  distilled water mash pH over beer color for 210 randomly generated recipes]]  +  [[Image:Beer_color_to_DI_pH.gifframecenter'''Figure 1'''  distilled water mash pH over beer color for 210 randomly generated recipes]] 
−  Based on this chart  +  Based on this chart the following observations can be made: 
−  * There is no simple curve that can estimate  +  * There is no simple curve that can estimate grist pH from beer color. 
−  * a wide range of beer colors can yield an grist pH in the desired pH range and an even larger color range can yield an acceptable mash pH (Note that this does not yet take  +  * a wide range of beer colors can yield an grist pH in the desired pH range and an even larger color range can yield an acceptable mash pH (Note that this does not yet take residual alkalinity of the water into account) 
−  * "Crystal only" and "Roasted only" recipes  +  * "Crystal only" and "Roasted only" recipes form clusters which can be approximated reasonably well with linear functions. 
−  * The more roasted malt is used to achieve the desired beer color the less pH drop can be expected per unit of color. This stems from the fact that roasted malts have less acidity per unit of color compared to crystal malts  +  * The more roasted malt that is used to achieve the desired beer color the less pH drop can be expected per unit of color. This stems from the fact that roasted malts have less acidity per unit of color compared to crystal malts 
−  [[Image:SRM_to_DI_pH_for_different_mash_thickness.gifframerightFigure 2  Grist pH over SRM simulation of 210 different Random recipe for 4 different mash thicknesses]]  +  [[Image:SRM_to_DI_pH_for_different_mash_thickness.gifframeright'''Figure 2'''  Grist pH over SRM simulation of 210 different Random recipe for 4 different mash thicknesses]] 
Figure 2 shows how the SRM to pH relationship changes for different water to grist ratios: the grouping remains the same, only the parameter for the linear functions change.  Figure 2 shows how the SRM to pH relationship changes for different water to grist ratios: the grouping remains the same, only the parameter for the linear functions change.  
−  With these observations the idea was born to estimate the grist pH from  +  With these observations the idea was born to estimate the grist pH from color, mash thickness and percentage of roasted malts in the specialty malt portion of the grist. I.e. if there are no specialty malts the linear function for "cara only" is used and if all specialty malts are roasted malts the linear function of "roasted only" is used. If roasted and crystal malts are part of the grist a function that lies between the two is used. 
−  Using the standard notation of a linear function the pH estimation from beer color and mash  +  Using the standard notation of a linear function the pH estimation from beer color and mash thickness can be written as 
[[Image:Linear_mash_pH_function.gif]]  [[Image:Linear_mash_pH_function.gif]]  
Where the new variable are:  Where the new variable are:  
−  * m(  +  * '''m(R<sub>mash</sub>,p<sub>roasted</sub>)''': slope of the function which itself is a function of mash thickness and roasted malt percentage 
−  * b(  +  * '''b(R<sub>mash</sub>,p<sub>roasted</sub>)''': yintercept of the function which itself is a function of mash thickness and roasted malt percentage 
−  *  +  * '''p<sub>roasted</sub>''': the percentage of roasted malts in the specialty malt portion of the grist (0  100%) 
−  As mentioned earlier the slope and y intercept of the linear function are determined by simple interpolation between the slope and yintercept for "cara only" and "roasted only" recipes:  +  As mentioned earlier the slope and yintercept of the linear function are determined by simple interpolation between the slope and yintercept for "cara only" and "roasted only" recipes: 
[[Image:SRM_to_RA_slope_and_intercept.gif]]  [[Image:SRM_to_RA_slope_and_intercept.gif]]  
Line 75:  Line 80:  
Now for some more regression analysis. If the slopes and yintercepts for "cara only" and "roasted only" recipes are plotted for the 4 different mash thicknesses (Figure 3) it is apparent that they can be fit well using a logarithmic regression.  Now for some more regression analysis. If the slopes and yintercepts for "cara only" and "roasted only" recipes are plotted for the 4 different mash thicknesses (Figure 3) it is apparent that they can be fit well using a logarithmic regression.  
−  [[Image:SRM_to_RA_parameters_over_R.gifframecenter]]  +  [[Image:SRM_to_RA_parameters_over_R.gifframecenter'''Figure 3'''  linear function parameters slope (on right) and yintercept (on left) shown as a function of mash thickness. The thin curves represent a logarithmic approximation which is is used to estimate slope and yintercept for any mash thickness between 2 and 5 l/kg]] 
−  The parameters, which were found, led to the following formulas for the "cara only" and "roasted only" SRM to grist pH  +  The parameters, which were found, led to the following formulas for the "cara only" and "roasted only" SRM to grist pH formula parameters slope (m) and yintercept (b): 
[[Image:SRM_to_RA_parameters.gif]]  [[Image:SRM_to_RA_parameters.gif]]  
−  
=considering residual alkalinity=  =considering residual alkalinity=  
Line 93:  Line 97:  
This pH shift (Delta pH) is added to the distilled water pH of the grist to predict the actual mash pH  This pH shift (Delta pH) is added to the distilled water pH of the grist to predict the actual mash pH  
+  
+  
+    
+    
= simple Guidelines for beer color and suitable brewing waters =  = simple Guidelines for beer color and suitable brewing waters =  
−  Using the  +  [[Image:Suggested_RA_ranges_3_lkg.gifframeright'''Table 1'''  Suggested brewing water residual alkalinity ranges in ppm as CaCO<sub>3</sub> for 3 l/kg (1.4 qt/lb) mashes. This data was calculated using the formulas shown in this article with the assumption of a low end mash pH of 5.3 and a high end mash pH of 5.5]] 
+  
+  [[Image:Suggested_RA_ranges_5_lkg.gifframeright'''Table 2'''  Suggested brewing water residual alkalinity ranges in ppm as CaCO<sub>3</sub> for 5 l/kg (2.4 qt/lb) mashes. This data was calculated using the formulas shown in this article with the assumption of a low end mash pH of 5.3 and a high end mash pH of 5.5]]  
+  
+  Using the aforementioned formulas simple guidelines for suitable brewing waters can be derived (Tables 1 and 2). These tables assume that a pH between 5.3 and 5.5 is targeted and show the residual alkalinity range for suitable brewing water based on the color of the beer and the roasted malt percentage of the specialty malt portion of the grist.  
−  +  It is apparent that for any given color there is a wide range of residual alkalinities that are likely to yield a mash pH in in preferred range of 5.3  5.5 which also explains why most brewers do just fine with their average water when brewing moderately colored beers.  
−  +  
−  +   valign="top"  [[Image:Icon_brewing_advice.giflink=alt={Practical Brewing Advice}]]  
+    
+    
= final remarks =  = final remarks = 
Latest revision as of 17:57, 26 February 2010
This article uses results from mash pH experiments to shed light on the relationship between beer color, mash pH and water composition. It develops a formula that can be used to make a crude prediction of the mash pH, or the alkalinity necessary for a given mash pH, based on the color and mash thickness of the beer. This formula has been implemented in the water calculator (Kaiser_water_calculator.xls) to predict mash pH from beer color, mash thickness and water composition. ContentsMalt color, type and acidity  
Brewers know that darker malts are more acidic. But what does it mean for a malt to be more acidic? They for sure don't taste sour. Malt acidity is the malt's ability to lower mash pH and it can be measured via 2 means. One is the pH of a distilled water mash. Because of the absence of pH affecting water ions the pH of that mash is determined only by malt acidity and mash thickness. Another approach is to take a sample from such a mash and add a strong base (e.g sodium hydroxide) to it until a predetermined pH (e.g pH 5.7) is reached. This process is called titration. The amount of base added per unit of malt is a direct measure of that malt's acidity. Testing the distilled water mash pH works well for base malts. Specialty malts, however, are generally much more acidic than base malts and testing their acidity through titration works better. In aforementioned mash pH experiments the following formula was developed for calculating the distilled water pH of a given grist. 

Where:
In English: the weighted average of the distilled water mash pH for all the base malts and the titration point for specialty malts (5.7) is determined. This pH is then lowered by the acidity of the specialty malts. The more acidic they are, the higher their grist percentage and the thicker the mash is the lower the mash pH of the grist will be. Random recipe creation and pH and color calculationsUsing the the measured values for the distilled water pH of selected base malts and acidity of selected specialty malts 210 recipes were simulated. The recipes were thrown together randomly with the following constraints:
Crystal and roasted malts were treated as distinct groups since they formed distinct clusters when their acidity was plotted over their color. For all these random recipes the distilled water mash pH of the grist and the color of the beer was calculated. The DI water mash pH was determined for 4 different mash thicknesses 2, 3, 4, and 5 l/kg. For the color calculation it was assumed that the total grist weighed 10 pound and the cast out volume was 5 gallon. The result were 4 sets of 210 data points that represent fairly realistic combinations of beer color (SRM) and the distilled water mash pH of their grists. One set for every evaluated mash thickness (2, 3, 4 and 5 l/kg). The data for 3 l/kg is shown in Figure 1. Based on this chart the following observations can be made:
Figure 2 shows how the SRM to pH relationship changes for different water to grist ratios: the grouping remains the same, only the parameter for the linear functions change. With these observations the idea was born to estimate the grist pH from color, mash thickness and percentage of roasted malts in the specialty malt portion of the grist. I.e. if there are no specialty malts the linear function for "cara only" is used and if all specialty malts are roasted malts the linear function of "roasted only" is used. If roasted and crystal malts are part of the grist a function that lies between the two is used. Using the standard notation of a linear function the pH estimation from beer color and mash thickness can be written as Where the new variable are:
As mentioned earlier the slope and yintercept of the linear function are determined by simple interpolation between the slope and yintercept for "cara only" and "roasted only" recipes: Now for some more regression analysis. If the slopes and yintercepts for "cara only" and "roasted only" recipes are plotted for the 4 different mash thicknesses (Figure 3) it is apparent that they can be fit well using a logarithmic regression. The parameters, which were found, led to the following formulas for the "cara only" and "roasted only" SRM to grist pH formula parameters slope (m) and yintercept (b): considering residual alkalinityNow that a method of calculating the acidity of the grist has been found, the residual alkalinity of the water (RA) needs to be considered to estimate the mash pH that a particular grist will give with the available brewing water. Mash pH experiments showed that the pH shift caused by the water's residual alkalinity depends on the residual alkalinity as well as the mash thickness. Where:
This pH shift (Delta pH) is added to the distilled water pH of the grist to predict the actual mash pH
 
simple Guidelines for beer color and suitable brewing watersUsing the aforementioned formulas simple guidelines for suitable brewing waters can be derived (Tables 1 and 2). These tables assume that a pH between 5.3 and 5.5 is targeted and show the residual alkalinity range for suitable brewing water based on the color of the beer and the roasted malt percentage of the specialty malt portion of the grist. It is apparent that for any given color there is a wide range of residual alkalinities that are likely to yield a mash pH in in preferred range of 5.3  5.5 which also explains why most brewers do just fine with their average water when brewing moderately colored beers. 

final remarksIt should be noted that the approach outlined here only provides for a crude estimation of the mash pH and that there are cases where this prediction will not be correct. In particular when the distilled water mash pH of the base malts differ significantly from the pH values used in the simulation. Another limitation is the range of mash thicknesses. But it is assumed that the range of 25 l/kg should cover most practical mashes.
